CVE-2024-39299
A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the qos.cgi qos_sta_settings() functionality of Wavlink AC3000 M33A8.V5030.210505. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to stack-based buffer overflow. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.
The versions below were either tested or verified to be vulnerable by Talos or confirmed to be vulnerable by the vendor.
Wavlink AC3000 M33A8.V5030.210505
Wavlink AC3000 - https://www.wavlink.com/en_us/product/WL-WN533A8.html
9.1 - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE-120 - Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (‘Classic Buffer Overflow’)
The Wavlink AC3000 wireless router is predominately one of the most popular gigabit routers in the US, in part due to both its potential wireless and wired speed capabilities and extremely low price point (costing at the time of this writing ~$60 USD). Among the configuration options, it’s also able to act as a standalone wireless gateway, a basic network router, or a wireless repeater.
When interacting with and configuring the Wavlink AC3000 wifi router, as is typical of most wifi routers, an administrator logs in via some web portal and configures appropriate options via the HTTP interface. In the case of this particular router, and in another somewhat common execution pattern, these HTML pages can invoke .cgi binaries due to how the lighttpd server is configured. Since all of these .shtml and .cgi files are located in the web root, anyone with network access to the device doesn’t actually need to log in to the device to interact with these .cgi files, and it usually is the responsibility of the .cgi binary to check if the authentication is completed successfully. On this device, one will see a check_valid_user()
function in each individual .cgi binary which will check the session
cookie of the HTTP request to see if it’s coming from a validly logged in user.
Assuming that we’ve passed this check in the qos.cgi
binary, we then run into a set of functions that we can call based off of what we pass for the page=
parameter in our HTTP POST request. Of the available commands, we focus on the following:
00400ce0 int32_t $v0_9 = web_get("page", $v0_7, 0)
// [...]
00400d08 else if (strcmp($v0_9, "qos_sta") == 0)
00400ebc qos_sta_settings($v0_7)
If we provide page=qos_sta
, we enter the qos_sta_settings
function and our provided POST data is further parsed therein:
00401508 int32_t qos_sta_settings(int32_t arg1)
0040155c int32_t cli_list_1 = strdup(web_get("cli_list", arg1, 0)) // [1]
00401594 int32_t cli_num_1 = strdup(web_get("cli_num", arg1, 0)) // [2]
004015cc int32_t time_control_num_1 = strdup(web_get("time_control_num", arg1, 0))
004015e8 char cmd_[0x800]
004015e8 memset(&cmd_, 0, 0x800)
00401608 sprintf(&cmd_, "/sbin/sta_qos.sh setup %s %s", cli_list_1, cli_num_1) // [3]
// [...]
Among the different POST parameters that this function can read in, we see most importantly that the cli_list
and cli_num
fields are read in to the heap without length checking at [1] and [2]. Since our input cli_list
and cli_num
fields both can easily reach 0x818 bytes, we can overflow the cmd_
buffer at [3] and overwrite the return address of the function, resulting in arbitrary code execution.
Thread 2.1 "qos.cgi" hit Breakpoint 3, 0x00401524 in qos_sta_settings ()
(gdb) b * 0x4017d4
cBreakpoint 4 at 0x4017d4
(gdb) c
Continuing.
[Detaching after fork from child process 15842]
[Detaching after fork from child process 16172]
[Detaching after fork from child process 16188]
Thread 2.1 "qos.cgi" hit Breakpoint 4, 0x004017d4 in qos_sta_settings ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x004017d4 in qos_sta_settings ()
#1 0x41414141 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: frame did not save the PC
(gdb) info reg
zero at v0 v1 a0 a1 a2 a3
R0 00000000 00000000 7751fee8 7751fb58 007bd860 00000001 00000011 00000000
t0 t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7
R8 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001 00001f00 00001ffa 00000001
s0 s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 s6 s7
R16 41414141 41414141 41414141 41414141 41414141 774a8c10 0043183c ffffffff
t8 t9 k0 k1 gp sp s8 ra
R24 00000000 00000000 00000010 00000000 00425d20 7f910228 00450000 41414141
status lo hi badvaddr cause pc
0100fc13 00000400 00000000 007bd850 50800024 004017d4
fcsr fir hi1 lo1 hi2 lo2 hi3 lo3
00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
dspctl restart
00000000 00000000
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Thread 2.1 "qos.cgi" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x41414141 in ?? ()
2024-07-25 - Initial Vendor Contact
2024-07-29 - Requesting reply from vendor
2024-07-30 - Vendor confirms receipt
2024-07-30 - Vendor Disclosure
2024-07-30 - Vendor confirms receipt
2024-09-02 - Status update request sent
2024-10-15 - Status update request. Upcoming expiration date announced.
2024-10-22 - Vendor replies product has been discontinued, but patches are being worked on
2024-11-04 - Status update request for patch release dates
2024-11-12 TALOS advisory release date announced
2025-01-14 - Public Release
Discovered by Lilith >_> of Cisco Talos.